Monday, October 3, 2005

« Previous: essential iron man! Next: reading: bite-sized books »

spoiler-free thoughts on Serenity

Back in the day, I read Warren Ellis' run on StormWatch and loved the strange stories, the nuanced characters, the optimism, and all the little quirks. Then, when that book ended and a group of the characters went on to star in its widescreen-style spinoff The Authority, I kept reading, but it wasn't quite the same experience. The stories were a lot tighter, the action was massive and incredibly choreographed, and the stakes were ratcheted up - instead of battling this baddie and saving that village, the heroes were saving entire worlds and taking on whole armies from alternate universes. The characters still carried out the plot, but they weren't exactly the same as they'd been in StormWatch. To me they came off as boiled down, simplified. The individual motivations that they'd had originally were all glossed into "wanting a better world", weaknesses were written out or ignored, and all of the characters became rock-hard badasses in service of the story. A lot of readers loved the book and its crazy mindblowing adventures, but I missed the character-driven aspects.

I'm bringing this up because it's the first thing that came to my mind after catching Serenity, the movie offshoot of the sci-fi series Firefly. I enjoyed the movie immensely - it's one of the better sci-fi films I've seen in ages. Aaah, Reavers and killing-dance-fu and big government experiments and Mal and Jayne and space dogfights and Jayne again! Yeah! Great story! But it did not feel as character-driven to me as the series did, which was a bummer for me since that's the kind of story I prefer. Somehow the characters felt more in service of the plot rather than driving it. Or maybe it felt more like River was driving the plot and everyone else was along for the ride and the shooting things. Could be that too.

I think I need to give it another round and see how I feel after a second viewing. At least this time around I won't scream like a four-year-old during the Reavers scenes. No, really. I was so embarrassed.

3 comments!     click to join in

1 mister_wolf   (4:01am - Oct 4, 2005)

I sort of see your point, but I'm not sure it wasn't invitable. I'm getting the feeling that Joss took his plans for the seasons 1 finale, stripped a bunch of stuff out, quadrupled the FX budget and that's what we got for a movie.

Actaually, I don't think the characters suffered all that much. Nobody acted WRONG, but the movie was basically, to my mind, all Mal with everybody else along for the ride.

And I was litterally shaking durring the big Reaver scene, so I can relate.

2 mister wolf redux   (4:04am - Oct 4, 2005)

Or maybe it felt more like River was driving the plot and everyone else was along for the ride and the shooting things. Could be that too.

There is an interesting discussion to be had on wether it was Mal or River's movie, but it's laible to be wicked spoilery, so I'll save it for a more private forum.

3 Jeph!   (4:20pm - Oct 6, 2005)

"Mal"? "River"? They've TOTALLY run out of names for sci-fi characters.


Say Your Piece

Comments are closed due to technical issues. They'll be back at some point! In the meantime, you can reply to me via Twitter (@metrokitty) or email me directly via my contact form.